Infill patterns can easily be overlooked when you’re 3D printing but they make a big difference in your quality. I always wonder which infill pattern is the strongest so I’m writing this post to answer it and share it with other 3D printer hobbyists.
So which infill pattern is the strongest? It depends on the application of your 3D print but generally, the honeycomb pattern is the strongest all-round infill pattern out there. Technically speaking, the rectilinear pattern is the strongest pattern when the direction of force is accounted for, but weak in the opposite direction.
There isn’t a one size fits all infill pattern which is why there are so many infill patterns out there in the first place, because some are better than others depending on what the functionality is. Keep reading to get more information about infill pattern strength and other important factors for part strength.
Pro Tip: A good 3D printer can make a difference in part strength due to smoother extrusion. The Creality Ender 3 V2 (Amazon) is a great choice that is loved by many users. You can also get it cheaper from BangGood, but usually with a slightly longer delivery!
What is the Strongest Infill Pattern?
A 2016 study on the found that a combination of a rectilinear pattern with 100% infill showed the highest tensile strength at a value of 36.4 Mpa.
This was just for a test so you wouldn’t want to use 100% infill but it does show the real effectiveness of this infill pattern.
The strongest infill pattern is Rectilinear, but only when it’s aligned to the force direction, it has its weaknesses so keep this in mind. When we talk about the specific direction of force, the rectilinear infill pattern is very strong in the direction of force, but much weaker against the direction of force.
Surprisingly enough, the rectilinear infill pattern happens to be very efficient in terms of plastic use so it prints faster than honeycomb (30% faster) and a few other patterns out there.
The best all-round infill pattern has to be honeycomb, otherwise known as cubic.
Honeycomb (cubic) is probably the most popular 3D printing infill pattern out there. A lot of 3D printer users will recommend it because it has such great qualities and characteristics. I use it for a lot of my prints and I don’t have any issues with it.
Honeycomb has less strength in the direction of force but has an equal amount of strength in all directions which make it technically stronger overall, because you can argue you’re only as strong as your weakest link.
Not only does the honeycomb infill pattern look aesthetically pleasing, it’s widely used in many applications for strength. Even aerospace grade composite sandwich panels include the honeycomb pattern in their parts so you know it has earned its stripes.
Do keep in mind the aerospace industry uses this infill pattern mainly because of the manufacturing process rather than the strength. It’s the strongest infill they can use given their resources, otherwise they may use a gyroid or cubic pattern.
For certain materials it can be quite difficult to use some infill patterns so they make the best of what they can do.
Honeycomb does use a lot of movement, meaning it is slower to print.
Tests were done by My3DMatter to see the influence of infill patterns on mechanical performance and they found that the best patterns to use are either linear or diagonal (linear tilted by 45°).
When using lower infill percentages, there wasn’t much difference between linear, diagonal or even hexagonal (honeycomb) patterns and since honeycomb is slower it’s not a good idea to use it at low infill densities.
At higher infill percentages, hexagonal showed similar mechanical strength as linear, while diagonal actually showed 10% more strength than linear.
List of the Strongest Infill Patterns
We have infill patterns which are known as either 2D or 3D.
Many people will use 2D infills for the average print, some can be quick infills that are used for weaker models, but you still have strong 2D infills out there.
You also have your standard 3D infills which are used to make your 3D prints not only stronger, but stronger in all directions of force.
These will take more time to print but they make a big difference in the mechanical strength of 3D printed models, great for functional prints.
It’s good to keep in mind there are many different slicers out there, but whether you are using Cura, Simplify3D, Slic3r, Makerbot or Prusa there will be versions of these strong infill patterns, as well as some custom patterns.
The strongest infill patterns are:
- Grid – 2D infill
- Triangles – 2D infill
- Tri-hexagon – 2D infill
- Cubic – 3D infill
- Cubic (subdivision) – 3D infill and uses less material than Cubic
- Octet – 3D infill
- Quarter Cubic – 3D infill
- Gyroid – Increased strength at lower weight
Gyroid and rectilinear are two other great choices that are known for having high strength. Gyroid can have trouble printing when your infill density is low so it will take some trial and error to get things right.
Cubic subdivision is a type that is very strong and also fast to print. It has amazing strength in 3 dimensions and long straight printing paths which give it quicker infill layers.
What is the Strongest Infill Percentage
Another important factor for part strength is infill percentage which gives parts more structural integrity.
If you think about it, generally the more plastic in the middle of a part, the stronger it’s going to be because force will have to break through more mass.
The obvious answer here is that 100% infill will be the strongest infill percentage, but there is more to it. We have to balance out printing time and material with part strength.
The average infill density that 3D printer users apply is 20%, also being the default in many slicer programs.
It’s a great infill density for parts made for looks and that are non-load bearing but for functional parts that need strength, we can definitely go higher.
It’s good to know that once you get to a very high filament percentage like 50%, it definitely has big diminishing returns on how much more it strengthens your parts.
Going above 75% is mostly unnecessary so keep this in mind before wasting your filament. They also make your parts heavier which could make it even more likely to break due to physics and force, because Mass x Acceleration = Net Force.
What is the Quickest Infill Pattern?
The quickest infill pattern has to be the lines pattern that you may have seen in videos and pictures.
This is probably the most popular infill pattern and are defaults in many slicer software out there. It has a decent amount of strength and uses a low amount of filament, making it the quickest infill pattern out there, other than having no pattern at all.
What Other Factors Make 3D Prints Strong?
Although you came here searching for infill patterns for strength, wall thickness or the number of walls has a bigger impact on part strength and there are many other factors. A great resource for strong 3D prints is this Github post.
There is actually a pretty cool product that can make your 3D printed parts stronger that is implemented by some 3D printer users. It’s called the Smooth-On XTC-3D High Performance Coating.
It’s made to give 3D prints a smooth finish, but it also has the effect of making 3D parts slightly stronger, as it adds a coat around the outside.
Not all filament is made the same so make sure you get filament from a reputable, trusted brand for the best quality out there. I recently made a post about How Long 3D Printed Parts Last which has information about this so free to check it out.
A lot of filament has been developed to be made stronger which you can take advantage of. Rather than using the usual PLA, you can opt-in for PLA plus or PLA which is blended with other materials such as wood, carbon fibre, copper and much more. I have an Ultimate Filament Guide which details many of the different filament materials out there.
This is a simple but overlooked method that can strengthen your prints. The weak points of your prints will always be the layer lines.
The information from this little experiment should give you a better understanding as to how to position your parts for printing. It may be as easy as rotating your part 45 degrees to more than double the strength of your print. Or, if you don’t mind the excess material use and long print times, you can’t go wrong with the “solid” print density configuration.
There is a special term called anisotropic which means an object has most of it’s strength in the XY direction rather than the Z direction. In some cases Z axis tension can be 4-5 times weaker than XY axis tension.
Parts 1 and 3 were the weakest because of the pattern direction of the infill was parallel to the edges of the object. This meant the main strength the part had was from the weak bonding strength of PLA, which in small parts will be very little.
Simply rotating your part 45 degrees has the ability to give your printed parts double the amount of strength.
Number of Shells/Perimeters
Shells are defined as all the outer parts or near the outside of the model which are outlines or outer perimeters of each layer. Put in simple terms they are the number of layers on the outside of a print.
Shells have a massive impact on part strength, where adding just one extra shell could technically give the same part strength as an extra 15% infill on a 3D printed part.
When printing, shells are the parts that are printed first for each layer. Do keep in mind, doing this will of course increase your printing time so there is a trade-off.
As well as adding shells to your prints, you can increase the shell thickness to increase part strength.
This is done a lot when parts need to be sanded down or post-processed because it wears the part away. Having more shell thickness allows you to sand down the part and have the original looks of your model.
Shell thickness is normally valued at a multiple of your nozzle diameter mainly to avoid print imperfections.
Number of walls and wall thickness also come into play, but already technically part of the shell and are the vertical parts of it.
Around 10-20% of overextrusion in your settings will give your parts more strength, but you will see a reduction in the aesthetics and precision. It may take some trial and error to find a flow rate that you are happy with so use it to your advantage.
My3DMatter found that lower layer height weakens a 3D printed object, although this isn’t conclusive and probably has many variables that affect this claim.
The trade-off here however, is that going from a 0.4mm nozzle to a 0.2mm nozzle will double your printing time which most people would steer clear from.
For a truly strong 3D printed part you should have a good infill pattern and percentage, add solid layers to stabilize the infill structure, add more perimeters to the top and bottom layers, as well as the exterior (shells).
Once you put all these factors together you’ll have an extremely durable and strong part.